Sunday 07th June 2020,
North Yorks Enquirer

MWTC CCTV – Inadequate Evidence Of Crime

Guest Author ANDY STRANGEWAY highlights the unlawful operation of Closed Circuit Television Cameras (CCTV) by Market Weighton Town Council. These legislative failures are common to many local authorities – not necessarily all of those within the Borough of Scarborough, but certainly some. The upshot is that Police all over Yorkshire may have obtained hundreds (perhaps thousands) of criminal convictions which are ‘unsafe’ on the basis that they have relied on legally inadmissible evidence. In consequence, rogues of every stripe may now have strong civil claims for compensation for their wrongful conviction.

On 6th June 2019, concerns of precisely this nature were raised (mistakenly, as it turned out) with Councillor Janet Jefferson [Ind.], who referred the matter to the correct Portfolio Holder for such matters (Legal & Governance), Tony Randerson [Lab.], that  CCTV cameras within the Borough may be falling foul of the same legal requirements. It has thus far not been possible to determine whether or not all local authority CCTV systems in the Borough are legally compliant. Readers are invited to review the Birmingham case referred to within the following article as well as the Humberside Police interactive map.

~~~~~

Market Weighton CCTV – Inadequate Evidence Of Crime

Market Weighton Town Council (MWTC) has revealed that the Town Council are in breach of the Home Office Surveillance Camera Commissioners compliance guidelines.

Market Weighton Town Mayor – Cllr Peter Hemmerman

They have confirmed:

  1. “The Market Weighton Town Council do not hold documents detailing the camera locations. Cameras are stalled in the High Street, Market Place, War Memorial Playing Field and the Aspen Play Park. All cameras are clearly visible.”
  2. “Market Weighton Town Council does not hold or have access to any information relating to crimes committed within the area other than that which is publicly available via the Humberside Police website.”

NB: An alleged crime remains alleged until successfully prosecuted in a court of law. Only upon conviction does it become a crime.

Conclusion

This clearly demonstrates that the MWTC CCTV system does not meet Home Office guidance as MWTC should have such information in the required assessment. MWTC has and continues to fail to operate its CCTV lawful due to:

  1. No signage
  2. Little or no crime

Please see Birmingham CCTV (click on the link to read)

As a result, those convicted when such CCTV evidence has been used have been convicted on inadmissible evidence.

I politely suggest that MWTC and Humberside Police seek legal advice. Hopefully, both have already informed their insurers that they have known about their failures since June 2019.

Further Information

It is a fundamental requirement that a CCTV system does not operate in areas of low crime and anti-social behaviour. There must be evidence of a significant level of crime. The law and regulations governing the use of CCTV have changed dramatically over the last few years and MWTC must ensure that the CCTV system it operates fully complies with the law. This must include a robust and thorough review of the CCTV network. This assessment would need to be supported by data from Humberside Police.

Upon completion of an assessment if any cameras are being used in locations where there is little or no crime recorded, they no longer meet the legal requirement for use as set out by the Home Office Surveillance Camera Commissioners Compliance Guidelines. If this is the case, all such cameras must be removed.

Civil liberties must always be respected, even by Big Brother.

Open To Suggestion

I invite MWTC to suggest to me how they intend to correct the mess they have created.

If they fail to make an appropriate suggestion to me, I will have no option but to refer the case to the Surveillance Camera Commissioner.

Comments are closed.