On Monday 12th May 2014 Scarborough Borough Council (SBC) voted to remove the titles of Alderman and Mayor from Conservative Peter Jaconelli. The removal was due to a large number of allegations of child sex abuse, some of them in joint enterprise with disgraced former Freeman of the Borough of Scarborough, Jimmy Savile.
Peter Jaconelli’s name was removed from honours boards at the Town Hall. The council and successive councils stated they will not endorse nor support such matters as memorials, street and/or property naming or other high recognition, office or award in Peter Jaconelli’s memory.
What are the requirements to become an Honorary Alderman? According to an old FOI request, the title is conferred upon those who have completed sixteen years service as a Borough Councillor. Two thirds of the council must vote to award the honour rather than the usual majority decision at a full council meeting.
The North Yorks Enquirer asked the council on the 3rd of April 2014 which councillors voted to bestow the Honorary Alderman award upon Peter Jaconelli in 1996.
Whilst the freedom of information (FOI) request was acknowledged by the council shortly after it was submitted, the council has deliberately avoided answering the FOI request. In fact, after the request was made, the council enacted a policy of ignoring FOI requests from anyone connected with the North Yorks Enquirer.
Looking at the terms of office, it is known that four serving councillors were sitting on the council when the honour of Alderman was bestowed upon Peter Jaconelli. Those councillors are:
- Cllr Derek Bastiman: (Conservative): Term of Office: 1995 –
- Cllr Eric Broadbent: (Labour): Term of Office: 1991 –
- Cllr David Jeffels: (Conservative): Term of Office: 1973 –
- Cllr Jane Mortimer: (Conservative): Term of Office: 1991 –
It is also known that when the honorary award was bestowed upon Jaconelli in 1996, the political state of the council was one of no overall control. The political balance of the council at that time is tabled below.
| Party | Seats | Percentage |
| Labour | 24 | 48% |
| Conservative | 14 | 28% |
| Independent | 8 | 16% |
| Liberal Democrat | 4 | 8% |
The political balance of the council suggests that it was necessary for the Scarborough & Whitby Labour party to do a deal with the Scarborough & Whitby Conservative party to enable the council to bestow upon Jaconelli the title of Honorary Alderman of the Borough of Scarborough.
An unusually large number of other local politicians also received honorary awards at the same time. Was Jaconelli’s Alderman award slipped in as part of a local political deal to ensure that high profile local party members also received the honorary award?
Given the vast number of rumours circulating Scarborough about former-Mayor’s decades of offending, why did the majority of elected representatives lavish the award upon Jaconelli? Why did the councillors think that a known paedophile was a fit and proper person to receive the Honorary Alderman award?
Did Eric Broadbent, the prospective Labour candidate for Parliament, vote to lavish the Alderman award on Jaconelli?
Comments are closed.