~~~~~~

PTC Voids ERYC Standards Regime

I am disgusted to learn that on 14 June 2017 Pocklington Town Council (PTC) confirmed their renegade status by voting against a decision made by the ERYC Standards Committee.

PTC voted against the ERYC Standards Committee recommendation that Councillor Martin Cooper must apologise to local resident Stan Tindale for his vile communication. Councillor Cooper had attacked Stan on social media telling him to get off his backside. Stan regularly falls over due to Parkinsons.

Statement From PTC Minutes

Please read Pocklington Town Council meeting 14 June 2017

NB: I did not make a vexatious complaint.

ERYC/PTC Relationship

The decision by PTC has demonstrated that they are a renegade government body.

To show such a public disregard for ERYC Standards and indeed the Code of Conduct undermines the relationship between the District and Town Council.

I find myself in an impossible position. On the one hand I believe the findings of the Standards Committee must be respected. Yet on the other I witness the conduct of PTC that highlights a lack of support for the Code of Coduct, Standards Committee, and local residents.

Indeed the conduct of PTC makes the Code of Conduct null and void.

Point of Principle

Due to the conduct of PTC I stand on the following points of principle.

• Current Complaints – There are currently two complaints against me. I will continue to work closely with ERYC with regards these complaints. I will decline any recommendations of the Standards Committee.
• Future Complaints – I will take no part in any future complaints made against me.

Invitation to fellow ward Councillors

——– Original Message ——–
Subject: PTC Voids ERYC Standards Regime
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 15:10:47 +0100
From: Andy Strangeway

Good Afternoon,

Could I please refer you to https://andystrangewayindependent.com/2017/07/27/ptc-voids-eryc-standards-regime/

Could I invite Councillor Mole and Councillor West to publically support the decisions of the Standards Committee?

Regards,

Cllr Andy Strangeway

• an “In My View” article by NIGEL WARD, updating readers on a small step of progress at one of the hitherto most incompetent Councils in Yorkshire.

~~~~~

In a recent article, I reported on the extraordinary way in which Pocklington Town Council (PTC) had been conducting its monthly meetings.

In a nutshell, instead of offering members of the public an opportunity to ask questions or make statements by the customary (and legally correct) method of SUSPENDING Standing Orders (the Council’s ‘operating system’, which prohibits interruptions from the floor), PTC had been CLOSING its meetings for that purpose, then unlawfully RE-OPENING them.

It is therefore the case that, for some years now, PTC has been unlawfully RE-OPENING its meetings. This means that all of the decisions (Resolutions) taken by the Council during these ‘re-opened’ parts of its meetings appear to have been unlawful – technically known as ultra vires.

Far from being a trivial matter, as the members of PTC seem to believe, this is, in fact, very serious indeed.

Many of the Resolutions passed by the Council during these apparently unlawfully ‘re-opened’ meetings involve financial matters – the payment of insurances, loan guarantees, salaries, NI contributions – and these have been made from the public purse without legal authority, during the tenure of former Town Clerk and Responsible Financial Officer Mr Richard WOOD.

I pointed all this out to PTC’s Town Mayor and Chair, Councillor David SYKES [Con.], at the 8th June 2016meeting. Regrettably, I was summarily ignored.

Word now reaches me that a number of Pocklington precept-payers are deeply unhappy about the fact that their money has been unlawfully disbursed.

Fortunately, it would appear that, following the retirement of Town Clerk and Responsible Financial Officer Richard WOOD, at the end of June 2016, a new Town Clerk and Responsible Financial Officer, Mr Gordon SCAIFE, has now taken office – though one wonders whether or not Mr SCAIFE’s appointment was itself legally valid. Personally, I suspect not.

Nevertheless, credit where credit is due; new Town Clerk and Responsible Financial Officer Gordon SCAIFE has published the Agenda for the 7th July 2016 meeting, in strict accordance with the information that I communicated to the Council’s Town Mayor and Chair, Councillor David SYKES [Con.] at the June meeting.

Needless to say, no-one from PTC has contacted me to offer thanks and appreciation for the much-needed advice that I imparted to them, having travelled to the June meeting from my home in Whitby, at my own expense, in the best interests of all concerned.

I invite them to do so now, so that the Pocklington electorate can see that their Town Mayor and his Councillors are capable of acknowledging the error of their ways, simultaneously evincing a modicum of common courtesy. That would be entirely appropriate.

• an “In My View” article by NIGEL WARD, reporting on ‘Amateur Half-Hour’ at Pocklington Town (Parish) Council.

~~~~~

Regular readers of the North Yorks Enquirer – and before that, of the Real Whitby Magazine – will be aware that I have been scrutinising all levels of local government since 2009, in the public interest.

At the level of the so-called ‘third tier’ – Town and Parish Councils – there have been some outrageous (sometimes comical) abuses of democratic process, amongst them:

• http://nyenquirer.uk/category/towns-parishes/seamer-crossgates/

Seamer & Crossgates Parish Council (in the Borough of Scarborough) behaved so badly that Private Eye magazine took them to task on three separate occasions:

Seamer & Crossgates Parish Council also featured in the BBC ‘Inside Out’ documentary which covered many of our exposés.

Another Parish Council to have disgraced itself was Exelby, Leeming & Newton Parish Council in the District of Hambleton.

• http://nyenquirer.uk/category/towns-parishes/exelby/

Closer to home, Whitby Town Council (WTC) has also conducted its business – our business – in the most incoherent manner imaginable.

• http://nyenquirer.uk/category/towns-parishes/whitby-town/

Yet despite a welter of well-justified criticism, WTC has recently elected to the titular position of Mayor the Councillor who so objected to being filmed in her capacity as a Councillor that she told a citizen-journalist:

• “You can shove your camera up your arse!”

Shame on you, Mayor Noreen WILSON. Shame on you, WTC.

It has taken five years for WTC to succumb to our lawful demands and, in consequence, to film their meetings and display them on the Council’s web-site – having allowed over two years to elapse since they passed a Resolution to that effect.

Astonishingly, Whitby Town Council once accorded to me and (two other campaigners) Letters of Commendation for our work campaigning for the restoration of Whitby’s historic (though dilapidated) lighthouses:

• http://nyenquirer.uk/whitby-town-council-thanks-local-campaigners/

To suggest that they have not the first idea whether they are coming or going reduces to farce the very serious fact that the are my local government representatives. The last time I checked, only one Councillor had the benefit of a genuine electoral mandate from Whitby electors – a stunning 124 votes on a turn-out of 12% (democracy in the fullness of its flower, eh?). The rest of them achieved their positions either unopposed or by the widely-discredited ‘old crony’ process of co-option.

Hinderwell Parish Council, on the border of Redcar & Cleveland, even abandoned a meeting, rather than succumb to the legal requirement to allow members of the public to film it:

• http://nyenquirer.uk/category/towns-parishes/hinderwell/

But even these examples of flagrant incompetence and general unfitness for office pale into relative insignificance in comparison to the sleep-walking antics of Pocklington Town Council in the East Riding of Yorkshire, whose meetings and Resolutions have been conducted for some time now in a manner that suggests that they have acted ultra vires (beyond their legal authority) on every substantive Resolution that they have passed for some time now.

On Wednesday 8th June 2016, I attended Pocklington Town Council for the specific purpose of drawing this disastrous departure to the Council’s attention. The graphic a little further down the page explains how it is that their Resolutions (to disburse monies from the public purse, to enter into loan agreements, and so on) appear to have taken place whilst the Council was not in lawful session. This could leave Councillors personally liable, jointly and severally, for any negative financial consequences.

Wednesday’s Meeting began with prayers. Christian prayers. Pocklington Town Council would therefore appear to be unaware of the requirements of the Equality Act 2010, which expressly prohibits favouring one religion over all others in affairs of government.

The Meeting proper began with Agenda Item 1, the invitation to receive Declarations of Interests from members, which took place without incident.

At Item 2 of the Agenda, the Mayor asked for a Proposer and a Seconder for a Motion to close the Meeting, in order to allow non-members of the Council an opportunity to speak. This Motion was carried unanimously and the Meeting was duly closed. (Remember that; the Meeting was duly closed). The normal (and lawful) procedure for allowing non-members to speak is simply to suspend Standing Orders.

From the floor, Mr Phillip JACKSON (for ERYC) addressed the Council on youth matters, followed by a Mr Steve FLEETHAM, who up-dated the Council on the progress of his karate club.

When East Riding of Yorkshire Councillor Andy STRANGEWAY [Ind.] took the floor, a new atmosphere pervaded the chamber. Councillors clearly did not like the home truths that Councillor STRANGEWAY delivered and, unbelievably, four members laughed out loud when Councillor STRANGEWAY referred to a radio-broadcast in which the information was imparted to listeners that Pocklington Town Council hates Councillor STRANGEWAY. Disrespect? Insolence beyond parody.

It was clear to me, as I rose to address the Chair, that the Council was in a state of suspended animation. The animus directed towards Councillor Andy STRANGWAY [Ind.] was tangible. In particular, Councillor Martin COOPER was sneeringly contemptuous. (I note that he has made some very intemperate postings on Facebook – well worthy of a Formal Complaint). Another Councillor’s jaw hung slack as a dribble of saliva, succumbing to the inexorable pull of gravity, traversed his chin at an oblique angle before dripping soundlessly to his knee.

Consequently, the Council was not in a receptive state to absorb the information that I spelled out to them in the clearest and most respectful terms:

Here is the document that I passed to the Mayor. It is simple enough but it might just as well have been in Sanskrit.

Despite my attempts to inform the Mayor, Councillor David SYKES [Con.] (elected, would you believe, by a majority of Councillors as being the most fit amongst them to conduct, as Chair, the lawful business of the Council) of the dangers of proceeding with the meeting in a manner contrary to both commonsense and the law of the land, I met only with a rude interruption (at 1m:25s in the clip) and a very clear indication that Mayor David SYKES had not the faintest notion what it was that I was attempting to communicate to him and his Council, nor that it was entirely to their collective advantage should I succeed. This was not ingratitude; it was blank incomprehension. Grass roots Toryism is not renowned for its perspicacity.

Pocklington Town Mayor David SYKES did not even bother to consult the out-going Town Clerk, Mr Richard WOOD (who bears responsibility for advising the Council on legal issues – and for publishing his series of absurd, self-truncating Agendas), or Mr Gordon SCAIFE, the in-coming Town Clerk, who takes up his unenviable post upon Richard WOOD’s welcome departure at the end of the month. (May the force be with him!).

Remember, the Meeting had been formally closed. Finished. All over. No loner in lawful session.

But Pocklington Town Mayor Councillor David SYKES [Con.] simply breezed ahead with the Agenda, oblivious to the risk in which he was placing himself and his hapless colleagues. The cogs had simply not engaged. The lights were on, but there was no-one at home. Even ERYC Councillor Dee SHARPE [Con.], who really ought by now, with some years of ERYC experience behind her grinding away under ERYC Leader Councillor Stephen PARNABY [Con.], to have recognised the enormity of Town Clerk Richard WOOD’s faux pas, displayed only an indifferent, almost vacant gaze.

I did my best to guide Pocklington Town Council away from the brink. It takes a special kind of dunderhead to spurn a lifeline when one is all at sea, and Pocklington Town Council is clearly hopelessly adrift, in blind denial of its own rudderlessness and redundancy.

However, the members of Pocklington Town Council, I am told, are busily proud of their web-site:

•  http://www.pocklington.gov.uk/town-council/councillors/

They look it. All thirteen of them. (Unlucky for some, eh?).

Most disappointing of all is the petty and childish jealous with which the members of Pocklington Town Council view the roaring successes achieved by Councillor Andy STRANGEWAY [Ind.] in the nine weeks since his storming election victory – victory at the main expense of PTC Councillor Paul WEST [Con.], who was confidently expected (and expecting) to secure what is generally regarded as a Tory safe seat.

According to many locals, Councillor Andy STRANGEWAY [Ind.] has made more of a positive contribution to the life of his community in the past nine weeks than Pocklington Town Council can claim for the past nine years.

In summation, I shall be sniffing around Pocklington Parish Council very closely indeed from now on. And I have a good nose for a rat.

Meanwhile, I leave you with a much-quoted provisional verdict that I may subject to appeal in the fullness of time:

• “I have never encountered such an out-of-date, ignorant and foolhardy Council”.

That may be an over-statement, but it has to be said of Pocklington Town Council that “that deaf, dumb and blind Council sure sets a mean benchmark”.